Thread: Why Google is OK?

At a recent meeting we were talking about the reversal of fortunes for Twitter and Facebook and wondering why Google wasn’t suffering as much. You had to be there to understand all the premises.

It isn’t about money because Twitter is shrinking in order to make more money. But the stuff that was exciting about Twitter, the way it acted as a conduit for all other software, it was sort of a message operating system on a global scale, the exciting stuff is exactly what they’re taking out to get to profitability.

Facebook is wilting because the thing that was lifting them up was their stock, and that’s not working for them anymore. In fact it’s working against them.

True, Google has multiple revenue flows, but I theorized that that isn’t why they have a pretty strong future. It’s because they’re open where Twitter is not. Think about it. I don’t have to be vetted by anyone to be part of their search engine. No one says yay or nay, and there are no funny rules about stuff flowing in or out, or using their code to display search results. Google is fairly laissez-faire. All you ahve to do to be in their index is to put it on the web, and we all know the web is the platform with no platform vendor. Anyone can put stuff there.

I believe Twitter would have a much brighter future, Facebook too, if they trusted the web If they let every bit of their service be replaced. That would force them to compete based on service and value and features. Now they get to be lazy and that’s fine for a while. But the crazy chaos of the web will eventually do something so exciting and you won’t be able to match it on Twitter. Had they been more trusting they would have guaranteed that whatever excitement comes along would be automatically include them.

Google, on the other hand, has a better chance. It would be good for them if they were more open-minded about accepting formats and protocols from people who don’t work for Google, but even with that inefficiency, they still have a pretty strong basis for continued growth.

And of course Amazon is the smartest of them all. They’re automatically part of everything because they do everything to support and enhance the existing protocols. They are very respectful of the web and choice. I can deploy my apps on Amazon if I want, but if Rackspace gives me a better deal, Amazon won’t fight me. Same with Rackspace of course. This is the way we like it. 🙂

Who did Apple bet on in this field? Twitter. They’ll never get networking right, imho. (I am a very happy Apple shareholder, btw.)


About Dave Winer

Dave Winer, 54, pioneered the development of weblogs, syndication (RSS), podcasting, outlining, and web content management software; former contributing editor at Wired Magazine, research fellow at Harvard Law School, entrepreneur, and investor in web media companies. A native New Yorker, he received a Master's in Computer Science from the University of Wisconsin, a Bachelor's in Mathematics from Tulane University and currently lives in Berkeley, California.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s